
While the tech giant claims its platforms were used primarily to rescue Israeli hostages and secure cyber defenses, critics and human rights organizations say the announcement raises serious ethical and legal questions about the use of American-made AI in a war that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians.
The statement, posted unsigned on Microsoft’s official website, comes nearly three months after an explosive Associated Press (AP) investigation uncovered how Microsoft’s Azure platform and AI services were being utilized by Israel’s Ministry of Defense in direct military operations. According to AP, the Israeli military used Azure to translate, transcribe, and process intelligence, which could then be cross-referenced with Israel’s AI-enabled targeting systems — systems known to determine airstrike targets in densely populated areas like Gaza.
Despite these reports, Microsoft insists it has found “no evidence” that its tools were used to directly target civilians in Gaza. Yet, the company did not disclose details on how exactly its services were used, refused to answer direct questions from AP, and withheld the full report from its internal and external reviews.
Was Microsoft Complicit in a War Machine?
Microsoft admits it went beyond regular commercial terms and gave “special access” and “emergency support” to Israeli forces, helping with software, cloud services, AI tools, and language translation during the war. The company maintains that each decision was taken with oversight, stating: “We believe the company followed its principles... to help save the lives of hostages while also honoring the privacy and other rights of civilians in Gaza.”
But human rights organizations and employee activist groups are not convinced.
A group of current and former Microsoft employees known as “No Azure for Apartheid” slammed the company’s carefully-worded statement, calling it a “PR stunt to whitewash their image” after public backlash over its ties to Israeli military operations. Hossam Nasr, a former Microsoft employee fired for organizing a vigil for Palestinians killed in Gaza, criticized the statement as insincere and said the company must publicly release the full investigative report.
A Broader Pattern of Tech Giants Backing Israel’s War
Microsoft is not alone. The Israeli military is known to hold similar contracts with Google, Amazon, Palantir, and other major U.S. tech corporations, marking a dangerous shift where cutting-edge civilian technologies are being repurposed for military aggression.
As thousands of Palestinians continue to die under aerial bombardment and siege, the role of Western tech firms—often shielded by vague ethical policies—is coming under harsh global scrutiny.
Are AI Tools Being Used to Kill – With Legal Cover?
Microsoft says its AI Code of Conduct and Acceptable Use Policy prohibit harm—but provides no proof these policies are enforced. With the Israeli military reportedly increasing AI-related operations by 200 times after the October 7 attack, many fear that corporate oversight is not enough to prevent abuses.
Critics ask: Can a company truly claim innocence when its tools are embedded in systems that help execute military strikes in civilian zones?



