The nomination has sparked strong reactions among political observers and analysts. Many experts believe the move was unnecessary and has created confusion about Pakistan’s foreign policy direction. However, some analysts argue that the government’s approach is driven by practical needs. They say Pakistan is trying to maintain stable relations with the United States and avoid tensions with Washington during a sensitive regional situation.
Experts noted that Pakistan’s current foreign policy appears to be based on careful balancing. While the country is reaching out to the US, its long-standing strategic partnership with China remains extremely important. Videos circulating on social media showed Pakistan People’s Party Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto Zardari and Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz being asked about the nomination. Both leaders avoided giving a direct answer.
Bilawal chose not to comment on the issue. Maryam Nawaz said the prime minister makes decisions in the best interest of the country, which many observers interpreted as cautious support rather than a clear endorsement.
Senior analyst Mazhar Abbas questioned the decision, citing Washington’s support for Israel in its ongoing war in Palestine. He said nominating Trump for a peace prize weakens Pakistan’s moral position on global issues.
Must Read: US loses nearly $2 billion in military equipment in initial days of Iran war
At the same time, Abbas noted that maintaining working relations with the United States remains strategically important for Pakistan. He also stressed that Islamabad should focus on lowering regional tensions and avoiding any escalation involving Iran, while continuing to rely on China as a dependable partner.
Former caretaker Punjab chief minister Hasan Askari Rizvi said foreign policy decisions cannot always be judged in absolute terms. He described the nomination as largely symbolic and linked to Pakistan’s economic limitations. Rizvi explained that Pakistan currently lacks the financial strength to pursue completely independent policies. Because of these constraints, the government often has to make careful diplomatic choices.
Another senior analyst, Rasul Bakhsh Rais, called the nomination a “blunder” that could harm the government’s credibility. However, he also said Pakistan’s effort to maintain balanced relations between the US and China remains a sensible long-term strategy.
Analysts said the coming days may show whether this controversial decision will affect Pakistan’s diplomatic image or remain only a symbolic political gesture.
